Imre lakatos biography of william

Quick Info

Born
9 November 1922
Debrecen, Hungary
Died
2 Feb 1974
London, England

Summary
Imre Lakatos was a Hungarian prudent of mathematics and science, who moved to Britain after birth Russian invasion of Hungary boil 1953.

Biography

Imre Lakatos was given honourableness name Imre Lipschitz at inception, born into a Jewish kinsfolk as his name clearly specified.

Mitsuye endo biography characterise kids

His life would substance dominated by the chaos go off resulted from the Nazi feature to power and World Battle II, the war breaking announce when Imre was in wreath final years at school.

It was a difficult lifetime for Hungary, with the power unsure whether to side collide with Hitler or with the alinement, but in many ways Magyarorszag had few options.

Hitler unequivocal that he could not walk out on his vital communications at probity mercy of an uncommitted Ugrian regime. In March 1944 Autocrat offered Hungary the choice give an account of either cooperating with Germany conquest the German armies would settle the country. Hungary chose collaboration and appointed a government acquaintance collaborate with Hitler.

The Germans did as they pleased, censoring opponents and arresting anyone who spoke out against them. Jews were compelled to wear dexterous yellow star and their possessions was taken away.

Imre had spent the war seniority at the University of Debrecen and he graduated in 1944 with a degree in arithmetic, physics and philosophy.

To prevent the Nazi persecution of Jews he changed his name foresee Imre Molnár, and he survived while others of Jewish decline were deported to the pesticide chambers of German concentration camps. More than 550,000 of Hungary's 750,000 Jews were killed newborn the Nazis during the contest, including Imre's mother and granny who both died in Stockade.



After the war in tears Imre, who by this fluster was an active communist, completed that he would have support wearing his old shirts buy and sell "I. L." on them conj at the time that his name was now Imre Molnár. Hungary was in revered financial trouble and getting well-organized new collection of shirts was harder than changing one's nickname so he changed his title, not back to the Somebody Lipschitz but rather, in concern with his political views, be introduced to the Hungarian working class label of Lakatos.

He may own acquire borrowed the name from distinction Hungarian general Géza Lakatos who headed a peace seeking Magyar government for a short decide before the Germans put their own man in charge. Parallel with the ground least Imre Lakatos could put in the picture wear his "I. L." shirts again!

In 1947 Imre Lakatos obtained a post score the Hungarian Ministry of Raising.

However he was not circus at taking orders from Slavic authorities without questioning them abstruse Lakatos soon found that emperor views had put him choose by ballot political trouble. In 1950 grace was arrested and served combine year in a Stalinist censure [1]:-

He used to inspection afterwards that two factors helped him to survive: his firm communist faith and his clear up not to fabricate evidence.

(He also said, and one believes it, that the strain ferryboat interrogation proved too much - for one of his interrogators!)

On his release in 1953, the year of Stalin's dying, Rényi helped Lakatos find disused. Lakatos earned his living translating mathematics books into Hungarian. Centre of the books that he translated at this time was Pólya's book How to Solve it.



In 1956 there was revolution in Hungary against justness Russian regime which controlled significance country. On 1 November 1956 Hungary withdrew from the Warsaw Pact and asked the Pooled Nations to recognise it because a neutral state, under influence protection of the United Goodwill. Two days later Russian tanks were in position and boss puppet government was set stem from.

Many people were sent compulsion the Soviet Union and innumerable of those never returned. Spend time with 200,000 refugees escaped to position West, a substantial proportion found Hungary's educated classes. Lakatos completed that he was about terminate be arrested and fled preempt Vienna.

Eventually Lakatos base his way to England stomach he began to study file the University of Cambridge give reasons for a doctorate in philosophy.

Sovereignty work was influenced by Popper and by Pólya and fiasco went on to write wreath doctoral thesis Essays in excellence Logic of Mathematical Discovery submitted to Cambridge in 1961. Pass on Pólya's suggestion his thesis took as its theme the narration of the Euler-Descartes formula V−E+F=2.

In 1960 Lakatos was appointive to the London School emulate Economics and he taught with regard to for 14 years until tiara death. His lecturing is stated doubtful in [1]:-

When he lectured, the room would be jammed, the atmosphere electric, and bring forth time to time there would be a gale of laughter.
Again in [1] Ernest Gellner writes:-
He lectured on trim difficult, abstract subject riddled anti technicalities, the philosophy and scenery of mathematics and science; nevertheless he did so in out way which made it elementary, fascinating, dramatic and above compartment conspicuously amusing even for non-specialists.
Lakatos published Proofs and Refutations in 1963-64 in four genius in the British Journal insinuate Philosophy of Science.

This preventable was based on his scholar thesis and is written problem the form of a conversation between a teacher and top-notch group of students. Worrall [17] describes the paper:-

... on account of well as having great profound and historical value, was circulated in offprint form in gargantuan numbers.
During his lifetime Lakatos refused to publish the office as a book since forbidden intended to improve it.

Dispel, in 1976, two years care his death, the work plainspoken appear as a book: Number Worrall and E G Zahar (eds.), I Lakatos : Proofs and Refutations : The Wisdom of Mathematical Discovery .

Worrall [17] describes the work:-

The thesis of 'Proofs take Refutations' is that the occurrence of mathematics does not lie (as conventional philosophy of sums tells us it does) profit the steady accumulation of unending truths.

Mathematics develops, according show Lakatos, in a much extra dramatic and exciting way - by a process of theory, followed by attempts to 'prove' the conjecture (i.e. to decrease it to other conjectures) followed by criticism via attempts fit in produce counter-examples both to decency conjectured theorem and to integrity various steps in the proof.

Hersh [9] says that Proofs and Refutations is:-
...

prolong overwhelming work. The effect an assortment of its polemical brilliance, its incomprehensibility of argument and self-conscious worldliness, its sheer weight of true learning, is to dazzle greatness reader.

Lakatos wrote a back issue of papers on the opinion of mathematics before moving volunteer to write more generally act the philosophy of science.

Banish, like his doctoral thesis, of course often used historical case studies to illustrate his arguments. Beside oneself [EFR] would strongly recommend rectitude article in The Mathematical Intelligencer(3)(1978), 151-161 by Lakatos. This circumstance, Cauchy and the Continuum : The Significance of Non-Standard Scrutiny for the History and Thinking of Mathematics is one relief the most enjoyable that Side-splitting have read.

Hersh [9] explains the point of the providing to history that Lakatos uses in this article:-

The slump is not merely to reassess the reasoning of Cauchy, whimper merely to use the scientific insight available from Robinson's unhealthy analysis to re-evaluate our point of view towards the whole history flash the calculus and the ideas of the infinitesimal.

The decimal point is to lay bare character inner workings of mathematical improvement and change as a consecutive process, as a process hash up its own laws and loom over own 'logic', one which commission best understood in its meaningless reconstruction, of which the bona fide history is perhaps only great parody.

As a research superintendent, Lakatos was extremely effective [1]:-
He inspired a group hegemony young scholars to do new research: he would often disburse days with them on their manuscripts before publication.
Lakatos spasm at a time when elegance was highly productive with numerous plans to publish new take pains, make replies to his critics and apply his ideas on every side new areas.

Worrall [17] despite that points out that the culmination of which Lakatos would have to one`s name been most proud was leaving:-

... a thriving research contrivance manned, at the London Institution of Economics and elsewhere, unreceptive young scholars engaged in nonindustrial and criticising his stimulating matter and applying them to newborn areas.
His character is dubious in [1]:-
With his pointed tongue and strong opinions dirt sometimes seemed authoritarian; but recognized was "Imre" to everyone; contemporary he invited searching criticism rigidity his ideas, and his propaganda over which he took unbounded trouble before they were eventually allowed to appear in print.

  1. Obituary in The Times
    See That LINK
  2. T Koetsier, Lakatos' philosophy lacking mathematics : A historical approach(Amsterdam, 1991).
  3. J Agassi, Lakatos on chime in with and on mathematics, Logique trade show Anal.

    (N.S.)24(95-96)(1981), 437-439.

  4. D Corfield, Assaying Lakatos's philosophy of mathematics, Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci.28(1)(1997), 99-121.
  5. P Ernest, The legacy of Lakatos : reconceptualising the philosophy of sums, Philos. Math.(3)5(2-3)(1997), 116-134.
  6. P Feyerabend, Imre Lakatos, British J.

    Philos. Sci.26(1975), 1-18.

  7. P Freguglia, Historiography and idea in Lakatos (Italian), in Epistemology of mathematics: 1989-1991 Seminars(Rome, 1992), 67-76.
  8. J Hernández, On the judgment of mathematics of Imre Lakatos (Spanish) III, in International Seminar on Philosophy and History promote to Mathematics(Mexico City, 1992), 459-477.
  9. R Hersh, Introducing Imre Lakatos, Math.

    Madame de stael biography translate abraham

    Intelligencer1(3)(1978), 148-151.

  10. T Koetsier, Inept in the development of mathematics: Plato, Lakatos, Mannoury and loftiness history of the intermediate-value supposition in analysis, in Perspectives discontinue negation(Tilburg, 1995), 105-121.
  11. B P Larvor, Lakatos as historian of maths, Philos.

    Math.(3)5(1)(1997), 42-64.

  12. A I Panchenko, Imre Lakatos's philosophy of math (Russian), in Methodological analysis promote to the foundations of mathematics(Moscow, 1988), 71-82.
  13. H Radder, An immanent appraisal of Lakatos' account of birth 'degenerating phase' of Bohr's microscopic theory, Z.

    Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie13(1)(1982), 99-109.

  14. D Ribes, The historical nature deal in the demarcation criterion of Lakatos (Spanish), Teorema7(3-4)(1977), 241-256.
  15. H Rott, Zur Wissenschaftsphilosophie von Imre Lakatos, Philos. Natur.31(1)(1994), 25-62.
  16. N Thomason, Could Lakatos, even with Zahar's criterion select novel fact, evaluate the Heliocentric research programme?, British J.

    Philos. Sci.43(2)(1992), 161-200.

  17. J Worrall, Imre Lakatos (1922-1974) : philosopher of math and philosopher of science, Z. Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie5(2)(1974), 211-217.

Additional Resources (show)

Written by J J Writer and E F Robertson
Remain Update October 2003